|
|
Contents of This Section
- What is the relevance of the fields of genomics and
gene therapy to brain aneurysms?
- What is all this "genomics" stuff, anyway,
and how will it affect me?
- What is the history of this field?
- What is the Human Genome Project?
- What is proteomics?
1. What is the relevance
of the fields of genomics and gene therapy to brain aneurysms?
As you read the section on Genomics, below,
and the section on Gene Therapy elsewhere in this Website
( take
me to the Gene Therapy section now),
you will learn that understanding the genetic basis for why
aneurysms form and rupture is extremely important. Why? Because
this knowledge may lead to the identification of a precise
molecular target for gene-based aneurysm screening and treatment
and, hopefully, will pave the way to preventing the formation
and rupture of these lesions altogether. This may seem like
a long shot, but my colleagues and I have already made great
strides in the fields of cerebrovascular gene therapy and
genomics, and we're dedicated to making this dream a reality.
Here are some studies published in premier cerebrovascular,
gene therapy and neurosurgical journals, reflecting my personal
involvement in this field, and some important scientific advances
we've made to date:
- VG Khurana et al. Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer
to human cerebral arteries. Journal of Cerebral Blood
Flow and Metabolism, 20:1360-1371, 2000.
- Comment:
This article reported the first time that human brain
arteries were genetically modified. In this work,
our goal was to use gene transfer technology (
see Gene Therapy Section) to
improve the function of human brain arteries. By demonstrating
that the function of normal human brain arteries can
be genetically enhanced (by transferring the vasodilator-producing
endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene), this work
paves the way for the improvement or functional restoration
of brain arteries that are abormal or diseased (e.g.,
in brain aneurysms, cerebral vasospasm, Moya Moya
disease, atherosclerosis, and arteriovenous malformations).
- VG Khurana et al. Protective vasomotor effects of in
vivo recombinant endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene
expression in a canine model of cerebral vasospasm. Stroke,
33:782-789, 2002.
- Comment:
This article reported that endothelial nitric oxide
synthase gene transfer could be used to protect brain
arteries against the development of vasospasm in a
mammalian model that mimics brain arterial spasm caused
by aneurysmal rupture (experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage).
- VG Khurana et al. A direct mechanical method for accurate
and efficient adenoviral vector delivery to tissues. Gene
Therapy, 10:443-452, 2003.
- Comment:
Here, we report a novel mechanical technique to significantly
enhance the delivery of genes to blood vessels and
other tissues, with the goal being more accurate and
safer gene transfer in the setting of a wide variety
of animal and human disease states. This work led
to U.S. Patent 6,821,264 which records the
design and applications of the surgical "GeneBrush"
(
take me to the GeneBrush
section now).
- VG Khurana & FB Meyer. Translational paradigms in
cerebrovascular gene transfer. Journal of Cerebral
Blood Flow and Metabolism, 23:1251-1262, 2003.
- Comment:
This article reviews the advances in gene transfer
technology as applied to brain blood vessels. It summarizes
the essential concepts and practice of gene transfer
and gene therapy, and how these concepts and practices
may eventually apply to the successful treatment of
brain vessel diseases.
- VG Khurana et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase
gene polymorphisms predict susceptibility to aneurysmal
subarachnoid hemorrhage and cerebral vasospasm. Journal
of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 24:291-297,
2004.
- Comment:
This work reported for the first time the link between
relatively frequent variations in the endothelial
nitric oxide synthase gene (eNOS, a gene encoding
the protein that leads to the production of the critical
blood vessel dilating molecule, nitric oxide) and
brain aneurysms.
- VG Khurana et al. The presence of tandem endothelial
nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms identifying brain
aneurysms more prone to rupture. Journal of Neurosurgery,
102:526-531, 2005.
- Comment:
This article reports brain aneurysms that are more
prone to rupturing can be identified according to
an aneurysm patient's eNOS genetic profile. It is
hoped that this work (Patent pending) may lead
to the development of a simple, rapid and cost-effective
screening tool for brain aneurysm rupture.
2. What is all this "genomics"
stuff, anyway, and how will it affect me?
To begin with, "Genome"
was a term coined almost 100 years ago, and currently refers
to the complete genetic (DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid)
code of an organism. For humans, the term could be used to
describe an individual's DNA "blueprint",
or the unique blueprint of a species (e.g., "human
genome").
Genomics, then, is the comprehensive
study of whole sets of genes, gene products, and their interactions.
We currently are living in the "genomic revolution",
which is a time in which the impact of genomics on biomedical
science and our professional and civilian lives can and will
be readily explored and appreciated.
Recall that a gene is a piece of biological
code that forms part of our "genome". Our
genome is essentially derived from our biological parents
following conception and is responsible for our development.
Although our development is undoubtedly intertwined with the
influences exerted on us by our respective environments, we
are essentially the products of our genes. In short, "genes
code for proteins".
Our DNA, which comprises "genes",
can be thought of as a long twisted (helical) code. The DNA
molecules are made up of long segments of four critical building
blocks (i.e., four "bases": A for
adenine, G for guanine, C for
cytosine, and T for thymine), linked
to a backbone of sugar (deoxyribose) and phosphate.
These nucleotides (each a base+sugar+phosphate) pair
with each other across the two backbones (i.e., two DNA strands)
via hydrogen bonds, such that the A base pairs only
with the T, and the G base pairs only with the C. The two
DNA strands are in opposite "directions" (one has
a 5' to 3' orientation, the other has a 3' to 5' orientation,
so these strands are "antiparallel") and
form a uniformly twisted structure called a double-helix.
The human genome contains about 3 billion base pairs.
Drs. Watson and Crick were awarded Nobel Prizes for
working out the double-helix conformation of DNA.
The Building Blocks
of Genes:

Figure 1 shows key components of genes
(DNA). See text above.
There are 46 chromosomes (23 pairs)
in a human cell, where each chromosome represents a unique
section of the genomic DNA that is tightly packed (compacted)
into supercoiled structures, a process helped by histone
proteins. Twenty two pairs of these chromosomes represent
"autosomal" DNA, and the one other pair represents
"gender/sex" DNA. All this material is found in
the nucleus of a cell. The information contained (i.e.,
encoded) in genes is converted through complex molecular
processes known as transcription and translation
into proteins. The micromachinery and mechanisms for
this are well beyond the scope or aims of this Website, but
can be found in basic genetics texts and on the Web
using appropriate keyword search terms.
Proteins are large molecules that
represent the fundamental building blocks of the tissues that
make up our bodies. There is an enormous variety of proteins
in our bodies as they have evolved to play unique and essential
roles in cell structure and function. For example, some proteins
are enzymes involved in an array of metabolic pathways, others
participate in structural support, while others act as "receptors"
or "channels" or "molecular motors" or
"chaperones" in cellular communication, signaling,
gating, and transport. Note that proteins may have more than
one function. There at least 30,000 genes in the human
genome, but there a many many more proteins (i.e., one
gene can encode for many proteins, based on the occurrence
of "posttranscriptional-posttranslational modifications").
DNA Transcription
and Translation Model:

Figure 2 depicts the process of DNA
to proteins. DNA in the nucleus (1) is converted into mRNA
(3) by complex micromachinery (2) in a process known as transcription.
The mRNA is then converted into proteins (4) in the cytoplasm
of the cell through a process known as translation.
These proteins may be used for nuclear work, cytoplasmic work,
cell membrane work, or secreted for work outside of the cell
(5).
The significance of all this: As elaborated
above and below, studying and understanding cell microstructures
and processes, and recognizing the number and types and functions
of human genes and proteins is fundamental to facilitating
recognition of the molecular basis of human disease processes.
Only then can we reliably develop ways in which to effectively
treat diseases.
3. What is the history of this field?
An excellent and detailed review is provided
by Lorentz et al. (Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002;
see Key References for this and
other important reviews in this field). The following is a
brief summary of the history of genetics:
Even as early as 2000 years before Christ,
there are records of the ancient cultures of Babylon and Assyria
practicing artificial pollination at the time of King Hammurabi.
Apparently, even in the few hundred years before Christ, the
relationship between heredity and the environment, the origin
of birth defects, and the determination of gender were topics
contemplated by the Greek philosophers Hippocrates, Aristotle
and Plato. Aristotle proposed an "epigenesis"
theory (in which an individual's development was deemed to
be influenced by interactions with his or her environment),
as opposed to a "preformation" theory (in which
an individual's future developmental path was deemed largely
preprogrammed, i.e., determined before birth) expounded by
Empedocles and Democritus. Debate regarding “epigenesis”
versus “preformation” came to the forefront again
in 1694, following publication of an essay by Hartsoeker supporting
preformation. In 1752, the Mathematician-biologist Maupertius
wrote the first report of an inherited genetic disorder (in
this case, a polydactyly condition in four generations of
a single family). In 1814, Joseph Adams wrote a landmark
work entitled "A Treatise on the Supposed Hereditary
Properties of Diseases" in which he discusses heredity
versus environment, dominant versus recessive conditions,
and the rationale for avoiding mating with one's own relatives!
In 1859, "On the Origin of Species", the famous
work written by Charles Darwin, is published, describing
a theory of evolution by natural selection. In 1865, Gregor
Mendel's classic work "Experiments in Plant Hybridization"
establishes modern genetics, and represented a scientific
validation of the basic tenets of genetics. Mendel is thought
of as the father of modern genetics, and his classic genetic
hypotheses are referred to as Mendel’s Laws of Segregation
and Independent Assortment.
Hand-in-Hand with the above developments
in genetics came progress in the understanding of cell
biology. In 1665, Hooke used a primitive light
microscope to first describe cells while in the 1760s,
cell theory takes a more formal shape after the observations
of Wolff. In 1838, Schleiden and Schwann suggest that
cells with nuclei are the fundamental units of life
and in 1855, Virchow proposes that cells generate by
division. Between 1860 and the 1890s, nuclein
is described by Miescher, chromatin by Flemming, and
chromosomes by Weismann.
Cell Components:

Figure 3. The figure immediately above
shows some important components of a cell. Our understanding
of genomics has developed hand-in-hand with our knowledge
of the structure and function of cellular components (organelles).
The description of these organelles is beyond the aims and
scope of this Website, but can be readily be found in many
basic Cell Biology and Histology texts and on
the Web by appropriate keyword searches. [1=Cell membrane
lipid bilayer, 2=Cytoplasm, 3=Cilia, 4a=Early
endosome, 4b=Late endosome, 5=Cell membrane-associated
proteins, 6=Nucleus and its nuclear membrane, 7=Nuclear
membrane pore complex, 8=Chromatin, 9=Nucleolus,
10=Rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER) studded with protein-synthesizing
ribosomes, 11=Energy producing mitochondria, 12=Smooth
endoplasmic reticulum (sER), 13=Scavenging peroxisomes
and lysosomes, 14=Microfilaments, 15=Centrioles,
16=Microtubules, 17=Cell transport micromotor
attached to microtubules, 18=Golgi apparatus, 19=Vesicles
targetted to cell membrane, 20=Intracellular macromolecule
complex, e.g., a heat-shock protein supercomplex]
The last century: The term genetics
was coined by the British zoologist William Bateson
in the first part of the 20th century, aroung which
time "Inborn Errors of Metabolism" is published
by Garrod, the father of biochemical genetics. At New
York's Columbia University, Morgan describes sex-linked
traits in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster.
while his students make huge leaps in the field of genetics
by determining that genes are located on chromosomes
and are arranged linearly. Muller, another student
of Morgan, induces mutagenesis in Drosophila and discovers
the origin of new genes by mutation. In the second
quarter of the 20th Century, Griffith and Avery characterize
the role of DNA in inheritance, while Linus Pauling
describes the molecular (genetic and structural) basis of
sickle cell anemia, a landmark contribution in terms of the
manner in which the disease is characterized. Soon after,
i.e., in the 1950s, Pauling describes the alpha-helical structure
of proteins, Chargaff discovers that the ratio of nucleic
acid bases (A:T, and G:C) is 1:1, and Franklin and Wilkins
produce X-ray diffraction patterns of DNA. Watson and Crick
determine the double helical structure of DNA, reported
in a landmark and brief paper in the Journal Nature
in 1953, for which they each are awarded a Nobel Prize. Crick
later proposed the dogma that DNA makes RNA which makes proteins.
Also in the 1950s, Tijo and Levan determine that there are
46 chromosomes in human cells, while Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome),
45X (Turner syndrome) and 47XXY (Klinefelter syndrome) are
described, marking the birth of the field of clinical cytogenetics.
In the 1960s, population-wide screening for phenylketonuria
(PKU) begins, representing the first widespread genetic screening
test, based on the work of Folling, Guthrie, and Susi. Tremin,
Mizutani and Baltimore discover reverse transcriptase showing
that RNA can make DNA! Holley, Khorana, Nirenberg, and
Leder crack the genetic code by determining the
DNA sequence for the 20 most common amino acids. In the 1970s,
restriction enzymes are discovered at Johns Hopkins, while
Southern develops the Southern Analysis (Blot) for
DNA. Sanger develops a DNA sequencing method, and Kan and
Dozy describe restriction fragment length polymorphisms
(RFLPs). In the early 1980s, Mullis at Cetus
Corporation (CA) invents the polymerase chain reaction
(PCR), and genetic disease discovery proliferates.
Automated PCR is born, and represents a key technology
in the Human Genome Project.
4. What is the Human
Genome Project?
In 1985, a scientific meeting convened by
Robert Sinsheimer, chancellor of UC Santa Cruz, proposes the
concept of human genome sequencing. Separately, Charles DeLisi,
Director of Health and Environmental Research at the Department
of Energy (DOE, USA), is asked to assess the utility of DNA
sequencing in detecting induced mutations in atomic bomb survivors.
In 1987, DeLisi starts the Human Genome Initiative
(HGI), the first U.S. Government program on genome research,
which is funded by Congress in 1988 ($17.3m to NIH, $11.8m
to DOE). In 1988, the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
establishes the Office of Human Genome Research, renamed
as the National Center for Human Genome Research (NCHGR),
directed by James Watson. In 1990, The International
Human Genome Sequencing Consortium (IHGSC) is (officially)
born, comprised of more than 2000 scientists from 20 institutions
in 6 countries. Their combined goal is referred to as The
Human Genome Project (HGP), originally a 15-year plan to map
and sequence the entire human genome. Francis Collins
takes over NCHGR from Watson in 1992. Craig Venter
pioneers rapid genetic ("shotgun") sequencing methods
and establishes a nonprofit organization, the “Institute
for Genomic Research” (IGR). The bioinformatics arm
of IGR becomes so robust that the entire (1.8 megabase) genome
of the microorganism (bacterium) H. Influenzae is sequenced
in less than 1 year. This feat represents the first complete
genome determination of a free living organism. Celera
Corporation is formed by Venter in 1998, at which time
Celera projects that three years is left till the sequence
of the human genome is determined. A “Private”
(Venter, Celera) versus “Public” (Collins, NIH,
IHGSC) sector race to sequence the human genome begins. The
first entire human chromosome to be completely sequenced
was Chromosome 22 (a collaboration between the Sanger
Institute in England, the University of Oklahoma, Washington
University in St. Louis, and Keio University in Japan). The
sequence was published in Nature, in December 1999.
In January 2001, the Genome issues of Science
and Nature are published: they detail the first
draft sequence of entire human genome.
Key statistics from
the Genome issues:
- There are 3 billion base pairs per haploid set of human
chromosomes
- There are at least 30,000 named and unnamed genes (Current
estimates: 70,000 human genes)
- The percentage of sequences are: 1% exonic (i.e.,
protein coding); 24% intronic (i.e., interexonic
or noncoding); 75% intergenic (repetitive sequences
and inverted repeats; also referred to as “junk”;
but one day we'll probably find out that it's not "junk"
at all)!
The field blossoms into
a bunch of subfields:
- Functional genomics: the study of functionally
(human development and disease) relevant gene sequences/variants
- Proteomics: the study of protein expression and
its relevance to genetic data
- Bioinformatics: the technology of data acquisition,
organization, storage, and analysis; high-throughput is
essential here
- Pharmacogenomics: studying an individual's own
particular (idiosyncratic) responses to pharmacotherapy
- Genoethics: a subfield covering issues such as
genetic engineering, human cloning, and the concept of
genomic predestination
- Diagnostics
- Prognostics
- Tissue Cloning
- Therapeutics: immunotherapy, stem cell
therapy, rational drug design, and gene and protein therapies
5. What is proteomics?
First note that the proteome (a fusion
of the words protein and genome, and a term
coined in 1994) refers to the total complement of proteins
encoded by the genome of a species. The proteome represents
the functional endproduct of the genome; unlike the genome,
the proteome is in constant flux.
Proteomics, then, is the study of
all proteins, including their relative abundance, distribution,
posttranslational modifications, functions, and interactions
with other macromolecules in a given environment.
- The key questions in proteomics:
- Which proteins are present in cells?
- In what abundance?
- How (and with what) do they interact?
- What are their roles?
- How can their expression and function be regulated
to benefit humans?
The subfields of proteomics inlcude: expression
proteomics pertaining to the relative abundance of proteins;
cellular proteomics pertaining to protein-protein interactions;
and structural proteomics pertaining to protein shape/conformation/structure.
Core techniques used in proteomics include Western
blot, 2-D PAGE, mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography,
immunoprecipitation, protein microarray technology, immunohistochemistry
and immunoelectron microscopy, x-ray diffraction, cellular
recombinant protein expression systems, enzyme assays, etc.
Finally, it should be noted that diversity
of proteins goes against the central tenet: one gene,
one protein. Proteomic diversity (which distinguishes
species) arises from events such as alternative splicing of
mRNA and posttranslational modification of proteins. This
accounts for the structural and functional differences between,
e.g., a human being and a fruit fly or a worm, despite the
differences in the number of genes being relatively small
(approx. 2:1)!!!
|